前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。

　　題目題材：教育

　　gre argument 222題目：

　　The following article appeared in a recent issue of a college newspaper.

　　Among all students who graduated from Hooper University over the past five years, more physical science majors than social science majors found permanent jobs within a year of graduation. In a survey of recent Hooper University graduates, most physical science majors said they believed that the prestige of Hooper Universitys physical science programs helped them significantly in finding a job. In contrast, social science majors who found permanent employment attributed their success to their own personal initiative. Therefore, to ensure that social science majors find permanent jobs, Hooper University should offer additional social science courses and hire several new faculty members who already have national reputations in the social sciences.

　　提綱：

　　We cannot evaluate the employment result because we do not know the base amount of students of these two majors.

　　Without detailed conditions of the jobs found by students, e.g. the pay, working condition, their positions, etc., and the number of students who found permanent jobs after one year, we cannot conclude that the job-placement record of social science majors is comparatively poor.

　　The author unfairly assumes that the graduates opinions could exactly reflect the universitys actual need.

　　The author ignores many other factors that would contribute to the comparatively poor job-placement record of social science majors.

　　The authors proposal may be neither sufficient nor necessary for improving job-placement record of social science majors.

　　注：題目中括號里的數字表明這句話體現的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。

　　無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應該養成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據就是作文的邏輯性要強。

　　前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。

　　題目題材：教育

　　gre argument 222題目：

　　The following article appeared in a recent issue of a college newspaper.

　　Among all students who graduated from Hooper University over the past five years, more physical science majors than social science majors found permanent jobs within a year of graduation. In a survey of recent Hooper University graduates, most physical science majors said they believed that the prestige of Hooper Universitys physical science programs helped them significantly in finding a job. In contrast, social science majors who found permanent employment attributed their success to their own personal initiative. Therefore, to ensure that social science majors find permanent jobs, Hooper University should offer additional social science courses and hire several new faculty members who already have national reputations in the social sciences.

　　提綱：

　　We cannot evaluate the employment result because we do not know the base amount of students of these two majors.

　　Without detailed conditions of the jobs found by students, e.g. the pay, working condition, their positions, etc., and the number of students who found permanent jobs after one year, we cannot conclude that the job-placement record of social science majors is comparatively poor.

　　The author unfairly assumes that the graduates opinions could exactly reflect the universitys actual need.

　　The author ignores many other factors that would contribute to the comparatively poor job-placement record of social science majors.

　　The authors proposal may be neither sufficient nor necessary for improving job-placement record of social science majors.

　　注：題目中括號里的數字表明這句話體現的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。

　　無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應該養成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據就是作文的邏輯性要強。