久久一区二区三区精品-久久一区二区明星换脸-久久一区二区精品-久久一区不卡中文字幕-91精品国产爱久久久久久-91精品国产福利尤物免费

GRE issue寫作范文:審查的公正性

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

GRE issue寫作范文:審查的公正性

  Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

  審查很少能夠做到公正。

  正文:

  Censorship is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.

  Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word common good should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the common good is the monarch good, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.

  The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as subversive and revolutionary, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterleys Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.

  Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I dont agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.

  以上便是新GRE issue寫作范文,各位考生在新GRE寫作練習中應加強對思維邏輯的重視,平時注意積累論據論證素材,注意借鑒一些新GRE寫作范文,來吸收其精華,提高自己的寫作水平。

  

  Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

  審查很少能夠做到公正。

  正文:

  Censorship is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.

  Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word common good should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the common good is the monarch good, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.

  The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as subversive and revolutionary, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterleys Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.

  Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I dont agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.

  以上便是新GRE issue寫作范文,各位考生在新GRE寫作練習中應加強對思維邏輯的重視,平時注意積累論據論證素材,注意借鑒一些新GRE寫作范文,來吸收其精華,提高自己的寫作水平。

  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线看免费观看韩国特黄一级 | 一级做a爰片久久毛片美女 一级做a爰片久久毛片免费看 | 一级毛片在线播放免费 | 亚洲视频在线免费播放 | 波多野结衣在线观看一区二区三区 | 免费一级毛片私人影院a行 免费一级毛片无毒不卡 | 欧美aaa级 | 国产一区影视 | 成人在线午夜 | 亚洲毛片 | 日本久久香蕉一本一道 | 欧美三级黄 | 欧美成人免费高清网站 | 97视频在线免费 | 特色毛片| 香港三级日本三级三级人妇 | 久久精品视频一区二区三区 | 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合久久片 | 日韩欧美在线观看视频一区二区 | 免看一级a一片成人123 | 久久精品a | 黄色美女在线观看 | 久久精品午夜视频 | 久久久久在线观看 | 性精品| 亚洲免费网站观看视频 | 久久亚洲国产精品 | 欧美日韩一日韩一线不卡 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 欧美成人精品一区二区 | 韩国一级毛片在线观看 | 欧美精品久久天天躁 | 成人性视频在线 | 欧美成人一区二区三区 | 国产精品高清免费网站 | 大陆精品自在线拍国语 | 欧美久| 国产三级视频网站 | 国产精品欧美视频另类专区 | 亚洲1314 | 深夜福利亚洲 |