無論是身處學校還是步入社會，大家都嘗試過寫作吧，借助寫作也可以提高我們的語言組織能力。寫范文的時候需要注意什么呢？有哪些格式需要注意呢？接下來小編就給大家介紹一下優(yōu)秀的范文該怎么寫，我們一起來看一看吧。

年底英文自我評價篇一

first, the ideological aspects

in the daily life, work and study, i always to a party member of the standard strict demands on themselves, conscientiously implement the party's basic line and the principles and policies, adhere to the party's ideological theory armed with their own minds, and always remain firm the right political position and direction. establish a correct outlook on the world, life and values, a firm communist ideals and socialist convictions, and strive to make themselves a qualified communist party members. in the 20__ year, the company was rated as outstanding communist.

second, learning

in the past two years, i have been actively involved in the study of political and engineering branches, insisting on a combination of intensive study and part-time study, carefully studying the learning materials distributed by the branches, making learning notes, and increasing the knowledge through learning. applied to the daily work of them. second, is always insisted on their own charge, in september 20__ for the peking university network education institute of human resources, through reading, online homework, video tutorials, take the exam, two years, has been enough for 85 credits, in june this year will be able to successfully graduate; third, by virtue of their hobbies, learning web site building, software applications, network knowledge, in order to better the company's web site and forum to lay a solid 1

foundation.

third, the work

over the past two years, with the care and help of the leadership, we have been able to accomplish all the tasks efficiently: first, to do well in the construction, maintenance, updating and promotion of the company's website; and to write the work report of the workers' congress and daily press propaganda ; third is to do the work of the communist youth league, the organization to participate in the activities of the construction group and achieved excellent results; fourth, the compilation of the compilation of the company's system to complete the work of the fifth, improve the work of the communist youth league, improve basic information, documents, organizational activities; six is to help colleagues to solve the use of computers encountered in a variety of small problems; seven is to complete the leadership of the various tasks. in the 20__ year by the company as a model worker.

third, the existing problems and shortcomings

first, in learning, sometimes lazy ideas, not long-term adherence, there is a narrow learning surface; the second is in work, young and fit, and sometimes dry work will be a little emotional, affect the work the normal development of the general, transactional work, the lack of innovation and pioneering , in the work and life, sometimes there will be some good ideas, really less to implement, or encounter setbacks and difficulties will be back. the above analysis of the problems, i will live in the future, work and study, always be checked, strict demands on themselves, and constantly improve themselves, strengthen self-cultivation, temper the party, to become a good party member.

年底英文自我評價篇二

ernest hemingway is a giant of modern literature. among twentieth-century american fiction writers, his work is most often compared to that of his contemporaries william faulkner and f. scott fitzgerald. combined with his outstanding short stories, hemingway’s four major novels—the sun also rises (1926), a farewell to arms (1929), for whom the bell tolls (1940), and the old man and the sea (1952)—comprise a contribution to modern fiction that is far more substantial than fitzgerald’s and that approximates faulkner’s.

faulkner was awarded the nobel prize in literature a few years before hemingway received this recognition, but their respective approaches to fiction are so dissimilar that this belated receipt says little or nothing about hemingway’s stature relative to that of faulkner. when set alongside faulkner’s mississippi novels, hemingway’s major works feature simpler structures and narrative voices/personae.

as or more important, hemingway’s style, with its consistent use of short, concrete, direct prose and of scenes consisting exclusively of dialogue, gives his novels and short stories a distinctive accessibility that is immediately identifiable with the author. owing to the direct character of both his style and his life-style, there is a tendency to cast hemingway as a “representative” american writer whose work reflects the bold, forthright and rugged inspanidualism of the american spirit in action.

his own background as a wounded veteran of world war i, as an engaged combatant in the fight against fascism/nazism, and as a “he-man” with a passion for outdoor adventures and other manly pursuits reinforce this association.

but this identification of hemingway as a uniquely american genius is problematic. although three of his major novels are told by and/or through american men, hemingway’s protagonists are expatriates, and his fictional settings are in france, italy, spain, and later cuba, rather than america itself.

while hemingway’s early career benefited from his connections with fitzgerald and (more so) with american novelist sherwood anderson, his aesthetic is actually closer to that shared by the transplanted american poets that he met in paris during the 1920s; t. s. eliot, ezra pound, and, most crucially, gertrude stein. in this context, we must realize that hemingway’s approach to the craft of fiction is direct but never blunt or just plain simple.

hemingway’s text is the result of a painstaking selection process, each word performing an assigned function in the narrative. these choices of language, in turn, occur through the mind and experience of his novels’ central characters whether they serve explicitly as narrators of their experience or as focal characters from whose perspectives the story unfolds. the main working corollary of hemingway’s “iceberg principle” is that the full meaning of the text is not limited to moving the plot forward: there is always a web of association and inference, a submerged reason behind the inclusion (or even the omission) of every detail.

we note, too, that although hemingway’s novels usually follow a straightforward chronological progression as in the three days of for whom the bell tolls, hemingway does make use of summary accounts of the past, of memories related externally as stories, and of flashbacks. these devices lend further depth to his characters and create narrative structures that are not completely straightforward chronicles.

hemingway is direct. but he is also quite subtle, and subtlety is not a trait that we ascribe to the american way. in the end, hemingway is an international artist, a man who never relinquished his american identity but who entered new territories too broad and too deep to fit within the domain of any national culture.