Fundamental physics Antimatter of fact

　　基礎物理 反物質(zhì)研究突飛猛進

　　Researchers at CERN have held on to anti-atoms for a full quarter of an hour

　　歐洲核子研究中心的科研人員讓反原子顆粒存在時間長達15分鐘

　　READERS who were paying attention in their maths classes may recall that quadraticequations often have two solutions, one positive and one negative.

　　數(shù)學課上認真聽講的讀者朋友或許都能想起二次方程式通常有兩個解:一個是正解,另一個是負解。

　　So when, in 1928, a British physicist called Paul Dirac solved such an equation relating to theelectron, the fact that one answer described the opposite of that particle might have beenbrushed aside as a curiosity.

　　因此1928年，當英國物理學家保羅狄拉克在解一道有關微觀電子的類似方程時，得到了一個描述電子顆粒負狀態(tài)的結(jié)果，該結(jié)果按照異常情況本應該予以舍棄，但實際情況并非如此。

　　But it wasn t. Instead, Dirac interpreted it as antimatter-and, four years later, it turned up ina real experiment.

　　狄拉克把這種負粒子解釋為反物質(zhì)，四年后，反物質(zhì)在真實的實驗中出現(xiàn)。

　　Since then antimatter-first, anti-electrons, known as positrons, and then antiversions of allother particles of matter-has become a staple of both real science and the fictional sort.

　　從那以后，反物質(zhì)研究首先是反電子，俗稱正電子，然后到其它所有物質(zhì)顆粒的反續(xù)狀態(tài)成為真實科學和虛擬科學的重要組成部分。

　　What has not been available for study until recently, however, is entire anti-atoms.

　　迄今為止，只有反原子還沒有得到全面的研究。

　　A handful have been made in various laboratories, and even held on to for a few seconds.

　　但少數(shù)反原子的研究已經(jīng)在不同實驗室展開，有些實驗室甚至讓反原子存在了幾秒種。

　　But none has hung around long enough to be examined in detail because, famously,antimatter and matter annihilate each other on contact.

　　但他們都沒有能夠讓反原子存在更長時間以提供細節(jié)觀測，眾所周知，這是由于反物質(zhì)和物質(zhì)在接觸過程中會互相湮滅。

　　But that has now changed, with the preservation of several hundred such atoms for severalminutes by Jeffrey Hangst and his colleagues at CERN, the main European particle-physicslaboratory near Geneva.

　　但現(xiàn)在這種情況已經(jīng)得到了改觀，歐洲原子核研究組織日內(nèi)瓦附近的歐洲粒子物理研究試驗室的Jeffrey Hangst及其同事已將數(shù)百顆這種原子的生命狀態(tài)持續(xù)了幾分鐘。

　　The reason this is important is that Dirac s equation is misleading.

　　反原子狀態(tài)不能保留的重要原因在于我們受了狄拉克方程式的誤導。

　　Antimatter cannot be the perfect opposite of matter, otherwise neither would exist at all.

　　反物質(zhì)與物質(zhì)不可能以完全對等的反狀態(tài)形式存在，否則任何一方都不可能存留。

　　If they truly were perfect opposites, equal amounts of the two would have been made in theBig Bang, and they would have annihilated each other long since, leaving only light and otherforms of electromagnetic radiation to fill the universe.

　　如果真是那樣的話，那么在宇宙大爆炸時期，它們二者生成的數(shù)量也應該相同，歷經(jīng)漫長的時間演化，它們早就應該互相湮滅，只留下光線和各種形式的電磁輻射充斥宇宙。

　　That galaxies, stars and planets-and physicists to ponder such things-exist therefore meansthere is a subtle asymmetry between matter and antimatter, and that nature somehowfavours the former.

　　因此物理學家認為星系，恒星和行星諸如此類的事物能夠存在的原因在于物質(zhì)與反物質(zhì)一定存在著一種微妙的非對稱性，而自然界偏偏鐘愛于前者。

　　Two such asymmetries have indeed been found. But neither is big enough to explain why somuch matter has survived.

　　實際上 物質(zhì) 與 反物質(zhì) 的非對稱性已經(jīng)在兩項試驗中被發(fā)現(xiàn)，但它們的非對稱程度還不足以解釋為什么會有大量的 物質(zhì) 存續(xù)下來。

　　Being able to look at entire anti-atoms might give some further clue.

　　通過觀察完整的反原子，科學家或許能得到進一步的線索。

　　Last November the ALPHA collaboration at CERN, which Dr Hangst leads, managed to putpositrons into orbit around 38 antiprotons-thus creating anti-hydrogen atoms-and then heldon to them in a magnetic trap for a few tenths of a second.

　　去年11月，歐洲原子核研究組織阿爾法合作項目負責人Hangst博士設法將一些正電子分別放入38顆反質(zhì)子的軌道這樣就產(chǎn)生了反氫原子然后讓它們在電磁阱中存留零點幾秒的時間。

　　Now, as they report in Nature Physics, the researchers have used their device to preserveanti-hydrogen for 16 minutes .

　　現(xiàn)在，研究人員在自然物理雜志上發(fā)表的報告稱，他們已經(jīng)利用設計的裝置將反氫子存在時間延續(xù)到了16分鐘。。

　　This gives the anti-atoms plenty of time to settle into their ground state, the most stablecondition a particle or atom can attain.

　　這給反原子充分的時間進入能量基態(tài)，這是粒子或原子所能獲得的最穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。

　　As a result, Dr Hangst and his colleagues can look in a leisurely manner for novel ways thatantimatter might differ from the common-or-garden variety.

　　因此，Hangst博士及其同事能夠?qū)ふ倚碌耐緩綇娜莸赜^測反物質(zhì)可能與普通物質(zhì)存在的差別。

　　Their first experiment will involve nudging the trapped anti-atoms with microwaves.

　　他們的首次實驗將包含用微波對捕獲的反原子進行微移。

　　If the frequency of these microwaves is just right, they will flip an anti-atom s spin.

　　如果這些微波的頻率恰好正確，它們將會反轉(zhuǎn)反原子的旋轉(zhuǎn)方向。

　　That reverses the polarity of the atom s magnetic field and ejects it from the trap.

　　于是原子的磁場極性被改變并將原子拋出電磁阱。

　　The frequency needed to do this can then be compared with that which flips the spin of anordinary hydrogen atom. If the two turn out to be different, it will point towards the natureof the mysterious cosmic asymmetry.

　　實驗所需的頻率隨后將與反轉(zhuǎn)普通氫原子旋轉(zhuǎn)方向所用頻率進行對比，如果兩種頻率數(shù)值不同，將為神秘宇宙的非對稱性提供證據(jù)。

　　Besides being of huge interest , such a result would also have a pleasing symmetry of its own.

　　這個研究結(jié)果除了非常有趣，該結(jié)果的本身也有令人欣喜的對稱性。

　　The original discovery of antimatter was a nice example of theory predicting anundiscovered fact. This would be a fact that repaid the compliment by predicting anundiscovered theory.

　　當初發(fā)現(xiàn)反物質(zhì)是理論預測未知事實的一個范例，而現(xiàn)在根據(jù)反物質(zhì)的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)不對稱性的事實則是事實預測了未知理論。

　　Fundamental physics Antimatter of fact

　　基礎物理 反物質(zhì)研究突飛猛進

　　Researchers at CERN have held on to anti-atoms for a full quarter of an hour

　　歐洲核子研究中心的科研人員讓反原子顆粒存在時間長達15分鐘

　　READERS who were paying attention in their maths classes may recall that quadraticequations often have two solutions, one positive and one negative.

　　數(shù)學課上認真聽講的讀者朋友或許都能想起二次方程式通常有兩個解:一個是正解,另一個是負解。

　　So when, in 1928, a British physicist called Paul Dirac solved such an equation relating to theelectron, the fact that one answer described the opposite of that particle might have beenbrushed aside as a curiosity.

　　因此1928年，當英國物理學家保羅狄拉克在解一道有關微觀電子的類似方程時，得到了一個描述電子顆粒負狀態(tài)的結(jié)果，該結(jié)果按照異常情況本應該予以舍棄，但實際情況并非如此。

　　But it wasn t. Instead, Dirac interpreted it as antimatter-and, four years later, it turned up ina real experiment.

　　狄拉克把這種負粒子解釋為反物質(zhì)，四年后，反物質(zhì)在真實的實驗中出現(xiàn)。

　　Since then antimatter-first, anti-electrons, known as positrons, and then antiversions of allother particles of matter-has become a staple of both real science and the fictional sort.

　　從那以后，反物質(zhì)研究首先是反電子，俗稱正電子，然后到其它所有物質(zhì)顆粒的反續(xù)狀態(tài)成為真實科學和虛擬科學的重要組成部分。

　　What has not been available for study until recently, however, is entire anti-atoms.

　　迄今為止，只有反原子還沒有得到全面的研究。

　　A handful have been made in various laboratories, and even held on to for a few seconds.

　　但少數(shù)反原子的研究已經(jīng)在不同實驗室展開，有些實驗室甚至讓反原子存在了幾秒種。

　　But none has hung around long enough to be examined in detail because, famously,antimatter and matter annihilate each other on contact.

　　但他們都沒有能夠讓反原子存在更長時間以提供細節(jié)觀測，眾所周知，這是由于反物質(zhì)和物質(zhì)在接觸過程中會互相湮滅。

　　But that has now changed, with the preservation of several hundred such atoms for severalminutes by Jeffrey Hangst and his colleagues at CERN, the main European particle-physicslaboratory near Geneva.

　　但現(xiàn)在這種情況已經(jīng)得到了改觀，歐洲原子核研究組織日內(nèi)瓦附近的歐洲粒子物理研究試驗室的Jeffrey Hangst及其同事已將數(shù)百顆這種原子的生命狀態(tài)持續(xù)了幾分鐘。

　　The reason this is important is that Dirac s equation is misleading.

　　反原子狀態(tài)不能保留的重要原因在于我們受了狄拉克方程式的誤導。

　　Antimatter cannot be the perfect opposite of matter, otherwise neither would exist at all.

　　反物質(zhì)與物質(zhì)不可能以完全對等的反狀態(tài)形式存在，否則任何一方都不可能存留。

　　If they truly were perfect opposites, equal amounts of the two would have been made in theBig Bang, and they would have annihilated each other long since, leaving only light and otherforms of electromagnetic radiation to fill the universe.

　　如果真是那樣的話，那么在宇宙大爆炸時期，它們二者生成的數(shù)量也應該相同，歷經(jīng)漫長的時間演化，它們早就應該互相湮滅，只留下光線和各種形式的電磁輻射充斥宇宙。

　　That galaxies, stars and planets-and physicists to ponder such things-exist therefore meansthere is a subtle asymmetry between matter and antimatter, and that nature somehowfavours the former.

　　因此物理學家認為星系，恒星和行星諸如此類的事物能夠存在的原因在于物質(zhì)與反物質(zhì)一定存在著一種微妙的非對稱性，而自然界偏偏鐘愛于前者。

　　Two such asymmetries have indeed been found. But neither is big enough to explain why somuch matter has survived.

　　實際上 物質(zhì) 與 反物質(zhì) 的非對稱性已經(jīng)在兩項試驗中被發(fā)現(xiàn)，但它們的非對稱程度還不足以解釋為什么會有大量的 物質(zhì) 存續(xù)下來。

　　Being able to look at entire anti-atoms might give some further clue.

　　通過觀察完整的反原子，科學家或許能得到進一步的線索。

　　Last November the ALPHA collaboration at CERN, which Dr Hangst leads, managed to putpositrons into orbit around 38 antiprotons-thus creating anti-hydrogen atoms-and then heldon to them in a magnetic trap for a few tenths of a second.

　　去年11月，歐洲原子核研究組織阿爾法合作項目負責人Hangst博士設法將一些正電子分別放入38顆反質(zhì)子的軌道這樣就產(chǎn)生了反氫原子然后讓它們在電磁阱中存留零點幾秒的時間。

　　Now, as they report in Nature Physics, the researchers have used their device to preserveanti-hydrogen for 16 minutes .

　　現(xiàn)在，研究人員在自然物理雜志上發(fā)表的報告稱，他們已經(jīng)利用設計的裝置將反氫子存在時間延續(xù)到了16分鐘。。

　　This gives the anti-atoms plenty of time to settle into their ground state, the most stablecondition a particle or atom can attain.

　　這給反原子充分的時間進入能量基態(tài)，這是粒子或原子所能獲得的最穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。

　　As a result, Dr Hangst and his colleagues can look in a leisurely manner for novel ways thatantimatter might differ from the common-or-garden variety.

　　因此，Hangst博士及其同事能夠?qū)ふ倚碌耐緩綇娜莸赜^測反物質(zhì)可能與普通物質(zhì)存在的差別。

　　Their first experiment will involve nudging the trapped anti-atoms with microwaves.

　　他們的首次實驗將包含用微波對捕獲的反原子進行微移。

　　If the frequency of these microwaves is just right, they will flip an anti-atom s spin.

　　如果這些微波的頻率恰好正確，它們將會反轉(zhuǎn)反原子的旋轉(zhuǎn)方向。

　　That reverses the polarity of the atom s magnetic field and ejects it from the trap.

　　于是原子的磁場極性被改變并將原子拋出電磁阱。

　　The frequency needed to do this can then be compared with that which flips the spin of anordinary hydrogen atom. If the two turn out to be different, it will point towards the natureof the mysterious cosmic asymmetry.

　　實驗所需的頻率隨后將與反轉(zhuǎn)普通氫原子旋轉(zhuǎn)方向所用頻率進行對比，如果兩種頻率數(shù)值不同，將為神秘宇宙的非對稱性提供證據(jù)。

　　Besides being of huge interest , such a result would also have a pleasing symmetry of its own.

　　這個研究結(jié)果除了非常有趣，該結(jié)果的本身也有令人欣喜的對稱性。

　　The original discovery of antimatter was a nice example of theory predicting anundiscovered fact. This would be a fact that repaid the compliment by predicting anundiscovered theory.

　　當初發(fā)現(xiàn)反物質(zhì)是理論預測未知事實的一個范例，而現(xiàn)在根據(jù)反物質(zhì)的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)不對稱性的事實則是事實預測了未知理論。