Those people, who think that reading selectively is better, believe that good books are as many as bad books. Those good books can give us pleasure and knowledge, while those bad books can only lead us to the wrong way. So, they suggest that we should only choose the good books to read and never touch the bad books.

　　But, the other people, who hold that reading extensively is better, think that one kind of books can only give us one aspect of knowledge. Even the best book only contains one field of information. So, they can easily come to the conclusion that to know more, to read more. So they believe that reading extensively is better.

　　To my point, we should choose good books to read and read good books as many as possible. By this way, we can increase the quality and quantity of reading.

　　I think reading not only selectively but also extensively. Because the two sides are not contradict. Our time is limited. So we can not read every book in the world. However, we will not be interested in every book. We should read those books may be useful to ours, read those books which we like. But those books which we choose must be extensively so it can give ours all kinds of knowledge, news and so on, it also make ours become a wise man. On the one hand reading selectively let ours not waste our time which it is limitted. Moreover it can emphasis among all books that we can read. On the other hand reading extensively can deal with all kinds of need in our life. They are all useful to ours.

　　Most people thought that read books should have been selectived. But others belived reading extentively was correction.

　　Selective books or reading extensively?

　　Sure, you can choice one from previous ideas,

　　on one hand, There are too book to read for us. We should choose those which we intrested, and it would be helpful for us.

　　on another hand. Someones intresting was wide. Each book could bring you specific contain we couldnt reading at only one level.

　　I confirmed all of these ideas were good but werent wise.

　　As a reader, the main task is to discover more and more books the second task is to held some which wonderful and helpful for us. Dont treat these books with rackless abandon.

　　The best technology of reading is connect.

　　How should we read? Should we read selectively or extensively? Everyone has his own view.

　　Some people think we should read selectively. They argue that with the development of modern science and technology, more and more books are published. It is impossible for us to read all the books. Whats more, there are many bad books that are poisonous to our mind, and we shouldnt read them. Since we cant read all the books and we shouldnt read bad books, we must read selectively.

　　But others may not agree. They emphasize that todays society is not what it was. If one man has many kinds of knowledge hell have more chances to succeed. If a man knows much in one field but knows nothing in other fields, he may be useless. Since we must have many kinds of knowledge, we must read extensively.

　　Whos right? I think both of them have something right. But I think we should read extensively first. We should read books in many fields, and read selectively in one field.

　　Some people think reading shall be choosed. Because some books are good to hummen beings and some books are harmful to people.

　　Some people think that men shoud read books widely. Because wide reading can help man get much knowledge. And man can use it to change the world.

　　It is my point that reading must be selectively. Because reading is important to man. Some books can help man but some books can lead some people to crime. It can be seen in the newspapers and watched on TV. We can make full use of some good books and gain more useful knowledge. It can make our life more beautiful. we must give up those unhelpful books. They are not good to us. Reading them is wasting time and money. So reading selectively is an important part in reading.

　　Those people, who think that reading selectively is better, believe that good books are as many as bad books. Those good books can give us pleasure and knowledge, while those bad books can only lead us to the wrong way. So, they suggest that we should only choose the good books to read and never touch the bad books.

　　But, the other people, who hold that reading extensively is better, think that one kind of books can only give us one aspect of knowledge. Even the best book only contains one field of information. So, they can easily come to the conclusion that to know more, to read more. So they believe that reading extensively is better.

　　To my point, we should choose good books to read and read good books as many as possible. By this way, we can increase the quality and quantity of reading.

　　I think reading not only selectively but also extensively. Because the two sides are not contradict. Our time is limited. So we can not read every book in the world. However, we will not be interested in every book. We should read those books may be useful to ours, read those books which we like. But those books which we choose must be extensively so it can give ours all kinds of knowledge, news and so on, it also make ours become a wise man. On the one hand reading selectively let ours not waste our time which it is limitted. Moreover it can emphasis among all books that we can read. On the other hand reading extensively can deal with all kinds of need in our life. They are all useful to ours.

　　Most people thought that read books should have been selectived. But others belived reading extentively was correction.

　　Selective books or reading extensively?

　　Sure, you can choice one from previous ideas,

　　on one hand, There are too book to read for us. We should choose those which we intrested, and it would be helpful for us.

　　on another hand. Someones intresting was wide. Each book could bring you specific contain we couldnt reading at only one level.

　　I confirmed all of these ideas were good but werent wise.

　　As a reader, the main task is to discover more and more books the second task is to held some which wonderful and helpful for us. Dont treat these books with rackless abandon.

　　The best technology of reading is connect.

　　How should we read? Should we read selectively or extensively? Everyone has his own view.

　　Some people think we should read selectively. They argue that with the development of modern science and technology, more and more books are published. It is impossible for us to read all the books. Whats more, there are many bad books that are poisonous to our mind, and we shouldnt read them. Since we cant read all the books and we shouldnt read bad books, we must read selectively.

　　But others may not agree. They emphasize that todays society is not what it was. If one man has many kinds of knowledge hell have more chances to succeed. If a man knows much in one field but knows nothing in other fields, he may be useless. Since we must have many kinds of knowledge, we must read extensively.

　　Whos right? I think both of them have something right. But I think we should read extensively first. We should read books in many fields, and read selectively in one field.

　　Some people think reading shall be choosed. Because some books are good to hummen beings and some books are harmful to people.

　　Some people think that men shoud read books widely. Because wide reading can help man get much knowledge. And man can use it to change the world.

　　It is my point that reading must be selectively. Because reading is important to man. Some books can help man but some books can lead some people to crime. It can be seen in the newspapers and watched on TV. We can make full use of some good books and gain more useful knowledge. It can make our life more beautiful. we must give up those unhelpful books. They are not good to us. Reading them is wasting time and money. So reading selectively is an important part in reading.